Ospite intruder Inviato 21 Giugno 2009 Segnala Condividi Inviato 21 Giugno 2009 June 16, 2009: There are 35,000 U.S. Army military police (MPs). Their work involves guarding prisons, as well as convoy protection, police work on bases and security in general. There was a very high casualty rate for the reservist military police guarding convoys in Iraq. As a result of the Iraq experience, MPs were given even more combat training. While peacetime MPs spend most of their time performing security and police duties, in wartime, they are often in the combat zone, and frequently in combat. In Iraq this was even more the case. So now, MPs are trained to the point where they can be relied on to act as light infantry, doing most of the jobs regular infantry perform. The U.S. Army Military Police (MP) units have long been present in combat zones (and getting killed as a result) were never included among the combat arms. In past conflicts, truck drivers and MPs have been in combat zones and been involved in combat. But, again, never to the degree of the infantry, or, except in rare situations, the other combat arms. Moreover, the convoy battles in Iraq used tactics that tried to avoid close combat. Troops were taught to step on the gas if they came under fire, although if forced to stop, they were also taught how to get out and shoot at the enemy. But overall, most of the firefights over there involve American infantry, doing what they were trained to do. But the increasing use of MPs in combat situation in Iraq led to efforts to give the battle hardened MPs some recognition. So three years ago, MPs who were in combat were among the first to receive the new “Combat Action Badge” (CAB). This came after years of effort by the other combat arms, until the army relented and created the CAB for troops in armored, cavalry, combat engineering and field artillery units. Since World War II, the infantry have been eligible for the “Combat Infantry Badge” (CIB) if they served in an infantry unit, as infantry, in a combat zone. Holders of the CIB are much respected in the army. This is because the CIB indicates someone who has not just seen a little combat, but has spent time in the combat zone. The CIB represents having gone through sustained combat, the day after day of getting shot at and living very rough indeed. Sustained combat is a recent development, seen on a wide scale for the first time during World War I (1914-18). This continued during World War II. Sustained combat not only increased the chance of getting killed or wounded, but also gave us more combat fatigue. Troops in armored, cavalry, combat engineering and field artillery units, overall, suffer only a fraction of the casualties infantrymen do. But these other “combat arms” do get hammered much more than everyone else in the army. Even during World War II, 75 percent of the people in the army never heard a shot fired in anger. But the non-infantry combat units sometimes see more intense combat than the infantry, such as when combat engineers get out in front of the infantry to clear minefields and obstacles during a major attack. But overall, the infantry have always suffered most of the casualties (about 80 percent in the last century.) But that has been slowly changing. In Iraq, during some weeks, the infantry often took less than half the casualties. And many artillery and armor units were temporarily reassigned (after some refresher training) to infantry duties (mainly patrolling.) This is nothing new. During World War II, tank crewmen often served with infantry units. When a tank got hit, most of the crew usually survived, and got out of the vehicle uninjured. They were then expected to "fight as infantry", at least until a new tank was available for them or their damaged tank was repaired. Artillerymen keep their infantry skills up to date, and regularly set up defensive positions when they are in the field. In World War II, artillery units sometimes got hit by enemy infantry, or enemy artillery. Despite all this, these men have never been eligible for the CIB. That changed with the introduction of the CAB, but the many non-combat troops, especially the MPs, who had been in lots of action, protested. The army looked at the casualty figures, and decided to make all military personnel eligible for the CAB, and many MPs were soon awarded one. http://www.strategypage.com/htmw/htinf/art...s/20090616.aspx Link al commento Condividi su altri siti Altre opzioni di condivisione...
raptor1995 Inviato 18 Gennaio 2010 Segnala Condividi Inviato 18 Gennaio 2010 per l'italia i compiti di MP sono svolti molte volte dai carabinieri Link al commento Condividi su altri siti Altre opzioni di condivisione...
Folgore89 Inviato 28 Gennaio 2010 Segnala Condividi Inviato 28 Gennaio 2010 (modificato) Esattamente: in Italia sono i Carabinieri a svolgere le mansioni di Military Police, occupandosi delle indagini relative al servizio di personale militare e di quelle che devono svolgersi all'interno delle varie basi. Non dovrei sbagliarmi, ma mi sembra che il personale dei Carabinieri in servizio abbia libero accesso a tutte le installazioni militari sul territorio di competenza... Negli States, invece, ogni forza armata ha la sua MP e, per la Navy, tale compito dovrebbe essere svolto dai Marines. Correggetemi se sbaglio, perchè ho vaghi ricordi sull'argomento... Modificato 28 Gennaio 2010 da Folgore89 Link al commento Condividi su altri siti Altre opzioni di condivisione...
madmike Inviato 28 Gennaio 2010 Segnala Condividi Inviato 28 Gennaio 2010 No la Navy compone Shore Patrols con proprio personale. I Marines sono una forza autonoma. Link al commento Condividi su altri siti Altre opzioni di condivisione...
Messaggi raccomandati
Crea un account o accedi per lasciare un commento
Devi essere un membro per lasciare un commento
Crea un account
Iscriviti per un nuovo account nella nostra community. È facile!
Registra un nuovo accountAccedi
Sei già registrato? Accedi qui.
Accedi Ora